On 08/24/2010 07:44 PM, Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
>
>
>> On 08/23/2010 03:16 PM, Peter Soetens wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday 23 August 2010 14:49:32 Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
>>>
>>>> As we agreed at the developer's workshop, most of the tooling we have at
>>>> DFKI will be published as a different project than the main orocos
>>>> toolchain project. Right now, I merged all the tooling documentation
>>>> that we have. I'd like to publish it and I have two main options for that.
>>>>
>>>> The first one would be that I get some account on orocos.org so that I
>>>> can publish the pages on orocos.org/~dfki for instance.
>>>>
>>>> The second one is to publish it on DFKI servers.
>>>>
>>>> The first solution would be by far the quickest for me, as our IT
>>>> department is -- let's say -- not very quick with unusual requests.
>>>> Would it be possible ?
>>>>
>>> I have given 'Sylvain Joyeux'<your dfki address> full webadmin access to the
>>> website. There was also a gmail address (account 'sylvain') which I gave the
>>> same rights. The module you need is import html, right beneath 'Administer'.
>>> It's quite user friendly, but indeed better test first with a single page until
>>> you figured out how you like it.
>>>
>>> I can also setup a beta/testing site where you can first play around, but that
>>> will take some database& file cloning time... if you're going to play around
>>> with (global) css or so, this might be the better approach. If you send me
>>> your public ssh key, I can also give you login access if you need direct file
>>> access to the server.
>>>
>> Given the little time I have, I would rather just have a folder in which
>> I can copy the self-contained static webpages I have. I am sorry, but I
>> believe that I don't have the time to convert what I have into the
>> normal orocos.org design.
>>
> That is an understandable practical constraint...
>
> However, I would definitely want to urge to choose a much more descriptive
> name than "dfki": the name should be about _what_ is hosted on these pages,
> and not refer to _who_ has taken the initiative for the content. So,
> somehting like "XYZ-tooling" would make much more sense, with "XYZ" still
> to be defined in somewhat more details.
>
Well ... The "much more descriptive name" is Orocos/DFKI Toolchain.

If we find a better name, we will use it ;-)