ReferenceDataSource vs LateReferenceDataSource

mid-2011, ReferenceDataSource gained a setReference method which made it
very very much look like LateReferenceDataSource.

Am I missing something, or would it be possible to deprecate one of the
two ?

ReferenceDataSource vs LateReferenceDataSource

2013/3/25 Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain [dot] joyeux [..] ...>:
> mid-2011, ReferenceDataSource gained a setReference method which made it
> very very much look like LateReferenceDataSource.
>
> Am I missing something, or would it be possible to deprecate one of the
> two ?

Yep, it's a dupe. Both are in internal, so we can play as we like.

I'd prefer to keep (Const)ReferenceDataSource, also rttlua uses it too.

We might migrate/inline some of the LateRef methods into this class...
but we can't typedef it.

Other suggestions ?

Peter

ReferenceDataSource vs LateReferenceDataSource

On 03/25/2013 03:09 PM, Peter Soetens wrote:
>
> Yep, it's a dupe. Both are in internal, so we can play as we like.
>
> I'd prefer to keep (Const)ReferenceDataSource, also rttlua uses it too.
I don't mind. We'll just have to update the places where the Late* stuff
is being used.