For more information about this bug, visit
A new bug was added:
Summary: orocos versions for bugreports
Product: RTT
Version: orocos-trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Website - Documentation
AssignedTo: orocos-dev [..] ...
ReportedBy: wim [dot] meeussen [..] ...
The orocos bugzilla shows "orocos-fmtc", "orocos-trunk" and "rtt-trunk" as
versions. Are these all needed? This is quite confusing.
[Bug 369] orocos versions for bugreports
For more information about this bug, visit
wim [dot] meeussen [..] ... changed:
What |Removed |Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
------- Comment #3 from wim [dot] meeussen [..] ... 2007-04-18 10:58
Guess that'll do :-)
[Bug 369] orocos versions for bugreports
For more information about this bug, visit
A comment was added:
------- Comment #2 from wim [dot] meeussen [..] ... 2007-04-17 12:53
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > The orocos bugzilla shows "orocos-fmtc", "orocos-trunk" and "rtt-trunk" as
> > versions. Are these all needed? This is quite confusing.
> >
>
> I've removed orocos-fmtc, and renamed orocos-trunk to rtt-branch-1.0.
Nice! One more question: what is the difference between rtt version "1.0" and
rtt version "rtt-branch-1.0"? Maybe we could even omit the "rtt", as these are
all versions of rtt anyway.
Wim
[Bug 369] orocos versions for bugreports
For more information about this bug, visit
peter [dot] soetens [..] ... changed:
What |Removed |Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rtt-branch-1.0 |rtt-trunk
------- Comment #1 from peter [dot] soetens [..] ... 2007-04-17 11:09
(In reply to comment #0)
> The orocos bugzilla shows "orocos-fmtc", "orocos-trunk" and "rtt-trunk" as
> versions. Are these all needed? This is quite confusing.
>
I've removed orocos-fmtc, and renamed orocos-trunk to rtt-branch-1.0.
Better ?