[Bug 464] New: Inconsistent license in bfl
| Submitted by fcauwe on Thu, 2007-12-06 21:34. |
For more infomation about this bug, visit <https://svn.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=464>
Summary: Inconsistent license in bfl
Product: BFL
Version: trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: core
AssignedTo: bfl [..]
ReportedBy: francois [..]
CC: bfl [..]
Estimated Hours: 0.0
I noticed that there were different licenses in the source code of BFL, I would
expect that the license is GPL + exception ([1],[2]), but only the following
files have that license, the rest of the files state that they are LGPL:
./bfl/src/pdf/conditionalpdf.h
./bfl/src/pdf/mcpdf.h
./bfl/src/pdf/pdf.h
./bfl/src/pdf/discretepdf.h
./bfl/src/smoother/particlesmoother.h
./bfl/src/smoother/backwardfilter.h
./bfl/src/filter/particlefilter.h
./bfl/src/filter/bootstrapfilter.h
./bfl/src/filter/optimalimportancefilter.h
./bfl/src/filter/filter.h
./bfl/src/filter/asirfilter.h
./bfl/src/sample/weightedsample.h
./bfl/src/sample/sample.h
./bfl/src/model/systemmodel.h
./bfl/src/model/measurementmodel.h
[Bug 464] Inconsistent license in bfl
For more infomation about this bug, visit <https://svn.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=464>
Klaas Gadeyne <klaas gadeyne [..] > changed:
What |Removed |Added -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID CC| |klaas gadeyne [..]--- Comment #1 from Klaas Gadeyne <klaas gadeyne [..] > 2007-12-07 07:51:51 ---(In reply to comment #0)
> I noticed that there were different licenses in the source code of BFL, I would
> expect that the license is GPL + exception ([1],[2]), but only the following
> files have that license, the rest of the files state that they are LGPL:
This is intentional, see
<https://svn.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=416>
[Bug 464] Inconsistent license in bfl
For more infomation about this bug, visit <https://svn.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=464>
--- Comment #2 from François Cauwe <francois [..] > 2007-12-07 08:49:07 ---But the question is: Why do you apply the GPL+exception to discretepdf.h and
not to the gaussian.h? I would expect that only pdf.h is gpl?
[Bug 464] Inconsistent license in bfl
For more infomation about this bug, visit <https://svn.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=464>
Klaas Gadeyne <klaas gadeyne [..] > changed:
What |Removed |Added -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- Comment #3 from Klaas Gadeyne <klaas gadeyne [..] > 2007-12-07 09:07:58 ---(In reply to comment #2)
> But the question is: Why do you apply the GPL+exception to discretepdf.h and
> not to the gaussian.h?
That seems a different bugreport than the original one :-)
> I would expect that only pdf.h is gpl?
As discretepdf is no template code, I guess it should be LGPL indeed.
of discretepdf.h mentions both GPL and LGPL as a license, which seems incorrect
too.
Klaas
[Bug 464] Inconsistent license in bfl
For more infomation about this bug, visit <https://svn.fmtc.be/bugzilla/orocos/show_bug.cgi?id=464>
Tinne De Laet <tinne delaet [..] > changed:
What |Removed |Added -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED CC| |tinne delaet [..] en.b | |e Target Milestone|--- |0.4.3--- Comment #4 from Tinne De Laet <tinne delaet [..] > 2007-12-07 10:18:01 ---I will check the licenses.
Tinne