Breaking change to CartesianImpedance (motion_control)

Hi,

I'm committing a breaking patch to fix the old bug in the
CartesianImpedanceController [1] that required the stiffness to be
specified with a negative sign.

Is anyone using this Component and possibly depending on this broken
behavior?

Markus

http://git.mech.kuleuven.be/robotics/motion_control.git

Breaking change to CartesianImpedance (motion_control)

Hi Markus,
yes, I was using that version from Automatica to test some algorithms.
I have not looked at your patch yet, were there major changes (and what did change)?

Sincerely
Azamat

________________________________
From: Markus Klotzbuecher <markus [dot] klotzbuecher [..] ...>
To: orocos-users <orocos-users [..] ...>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: [Orocos-users] Breaking change to CartesianImpedance (motion_control)

Hi,

I'm committing a breaking patch to fix the old bug in the
CartesianImpedanceController [1] that required the stiffness to be
specified with a negative sign.

Is anyone using this Component and possibly depending on this broken
behavior?

Markus

http://git.mech.kuleuven.be/robotics/motion_control.git

Breaking change to CartesianImpedance (motion_control)

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:37:44AM -0800, Azamat Shakhimardanov wrote:
> Hi Markus,
> yes, I was using that version from Automatica to test some algorithms.
> I have not looked at your patch yet, were there major changes (and what did
> change)?

Take a look at it. The changes are major, but only internally, not in
terms of interfaces.

Markus